In Sweeping Policy Change affecting 37 BOP Policies, BOP updates categorizations of some violent offenses
The U.S. Department of Justice recently released a new Program Statement, 5162.06, which officially updates how the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) categorizes different criminal offenses. Effective March 19, 2026, this policy replaces the older 2009 version to ensure the list of statutory offenses is current and that legal examples are accurate. Essentially, this document serves as a master guide for prison staff to determine which inmates are eligible for specific benefits and which are not, based on the nature of their crimes.
The primary goal of this policy is to help implement various federal programs, such as early release under the First Step Act, furloughs, and compassionate release. Not all inmates are eligible for these perks. The Bureau believes that certain benefits are inappropriate for those who have committed “crimes of violence” or other serious offenses that the Director has decided should disqualify them. This ensures that public safety remains a priority when considering who gets a head start on returning to society.

One of the most important parts of the document is Section 3, which lists “Crimes of Violence”. These are felonies that are considered violent in every single case. The list is extensive and includes obvious crimes like murder, kidnapping, and carjacking, but it also covers more specific federal offenses such as destruction of aircraft, biological weapons violations, and even “robbery ashore” related to piracy. If an inmate is convicted of a crime on this list, they are automatically categorized as a violent offender for program purposes.
However, the policy also recognizes that some crimes aren’t always black and white. This is where the Director’s discretion comes in under Section 4. For certain offenses, the BOP looks at the specific details of the case to see if force was used, if a weapon was present, or if there was a serious risk of physical harm. For example, a drug trafficking charge (21 U.S.C. § 841) might not be “violent” on its own, but if the court found the person carried a firearm during the deal, they could be disqualified from benefits.
FSA Experts
We’ve now helped over 500 inmates with FSA & SCA
In the last two years we’ve helped over 500 inmates get home with FSA and SCA issues. Save now with our 2241 assistance just for reading this post
514
inmates home

Federal Prison Tips
Your #1 Source for Federal Prison News, Info and Post Conviction Relief
To get these details right, prison staff are required to dig into the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR). This report, created at the time of sentencing, tells the full story of the crime beyond just the statute number. Staff look for “Specific Offense Characteristics”—essentially “extra points” added during sentencing for things like brandishing a weapon or making death threats. If these factors exist, the inmate may be precluded from receiving early release or other benefits.
The policy also addresses complex legal situations like conspiracy and attempts. It clarifies that if you were conspiring or attempting to commit a violent crime, the Bureau will treat that attempt just as seriously as the completed act. They look at the “underlying offense” to make the final call. Additionally, there is a special section for “Old Law” offenses committed before November 1987, ensuring that even for older cases, the same standards regarding force and weapons are applied.
Ultimately, Program Statement 5162.06 is about consistency and clarity. It provides a roadmap for staff to follow so that decisions about inmate benefits are made fairly and according to the law. While the lists of statutes are long and technical, the core message is clear: the path to benefits like early release is much narrower for those whose crimes involved violence, weapons, or the exploitation of children


Leave a Reply